Curse

Mimi Miyagi · Apr 15, 2006, 04:12 AM // 04:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iskrah

Do you play sports Mimi Miyagi? Because if you do, based on what I read from your ideas of what's good/who's best, then... i'm sure you're crappy. No experience at all.

When you play ball, and you find yourself in different situations, you'll be able to know who has game and who doesn't. Plain and simple, not many brain cells required. You can hide your argument behind parts of what makes a good individual player (teamwork for instance), it doesn't help your case. Brett Favre, tens years after 1996, is not the same player and has a less good supporting-cast. And you extrapolate as to saying "hey see how relative it is!". No. An experience goes along with the ability to understand the causes and reasons. You'd make a bad scientist too.

Then use Dante Culpepper if you want. I don't care. Tom Brady hasn't won a SB lately either. And to top it off, the QB that DID win the SB sucks, yet he was the winning QB. Does that make him the BEST QB ever?

You're quibbling over scemantics, and missing the forest for the trees.

And anyone saying people disagreeing with this thread has security issues - I can also be childish and say all you fawning fanbois are simply projecting.

ChildeOfMalkav · Apr 15, 2006, 04:50 AM // 04:50

Mimi Miyagi, if you dont like the concept of this thread why can't you just leave it alone and STFU?

You have already derailed this thread with your childishness. If people want to believe that certain people are the best then let them. Why the F-- should you care?

Your stupid ego won't let you leave this thread alone that's what. Now stop trolling.

pigdestroyer · Apr 15, 2006, 07:50 AM // 07:50

yeah mimi just leave the thread already, we got your point 3 pages ago... mods?

Ensign · Apr 15, 2006, 10:20 AM // 10:20

The funniest thing about this thread is that the players being named aren't even the strongest players on their own teams. Ah, the gap between those earning the glory, and those actually getting it.

Peace,
-CxE

Rebelde · Apr 15, 2006, 10:28 AM // 10:28

Monk - One star
Warrior - Axe-Bob angry Sword-Last of master Hammer-Bloodlight, only because he is the only person I have seen run hammer.
Ranger - Who knows? But who is Woonori?
Mesmer - Tengu, by far
Elementalist - It's hard being a flashbot?
Necro - ?

jackie · Apr 15, 2006, 10:34 AM // 10:34

Ranger: Ganymede Jazz
Mesmer: Strawberry M
Warrior: Mertine Punatuuli
Elementalist: Edwin Bretoner

There... said.

I'm looking forward to meet these chaps in TA.

Brett Kuntz · Apr 15, 2006, 06:01 PM // 18:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ensign

The funniest thing about this thread is that the players being named aren't even the strongest players on their own teams. Ah, the gap between those earning the glory, and those actually getting it.

Peace,
-CxE

Well take soccer for example, all the soccer fans in the world will never agree on who's the best centre or who's the best goalie. There's going to be at least a thousand people on this planet that think their own goalie/player is the absolute best, even if they're on the last place team. It's all based on perception, everyone has their own internal score card of what makes someone the best, which is why other peoples results will often vary from your own.

And to the people who think there are no best players...you're obviously clueless when it comes to PvP in this game. If there were no best then everyone must be equal, and if that were the case how come every guild is different? It's the difference in individual skill as well as team based skill that differeciate guilds and players. Learning to work as a team is an individual skill everyone must learn. So people like Mimi can now take their jealousy to another topic. Thanks.

Str0b0 · Apr 15, 2006, 06:46 PM // 18:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by kunt0r

Well take soccer for example, all the soccer fans in the world will never agree on who's the best centre or who's the best goalie. There's going to be at least a thousand people on this planet that think their own goalie/player is the absolute best, even if they're on the last place team. It's all based on perception, everyone has their own internal score card of what makes someone the best, which is why other peoples results will often vary from your own.

Manchester United! Best club in the world and therefore the best players in the world. Man United FTW!!! Sorry had to.

Iskrah · Apr 15, 2006, 09:20 PM // 21:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mimi Miyagi

Then use Dante Culpepper if you want. I don't care. Tom Brady hasn't won a SB lately either. And to top it off, the QB that DID win the SB sucks, yet he was the winning QB. Does that make him the BEST QB ever?

It's Daunte, not Dante. And I'd say Brady has won enough "lately". Who said you had to be in the champion team to be the best individual player? We're just answering your previous argument that there is no best.
Just say it's hard to recognize the best, but not there are only "good players". That's crap.

Shai-hulud · Jun 13, 2006, 08:38 AM // 08:38

I do see many people mentioning the same people, tbh I don't know many of them as I don't watch high ranked battles often.

What I do know is that it is hard or even impossible to call someone 'the best player' for some class. I think u can say a certain team is the best, because of adaptability and things, u may as well be abled to call someone the most 'adabtable' monk, but maybe someone is a very good WoH healer and a very bad boon-prot monk and someone else is a very good SB/infuser while this person is bad at WoH healing. Therefor I think u can't really call someone 'the best <character>'.
I do however think that some1 could be 'the best WoH healer' or 'the best flag runner' but as I said, being very good in a few things or just one aspect of the characters potential doesn't make someone 'the best player on that character'...